Qualification standard adjustment triggers deepening reform in the construction industry
Editor's note: Recently, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development issued the "Letter for Adjusting Some Indicators of Qualification Standards for Construction Enterprises", which caused a thousand waves, which caused a huge response in the construction industry. The "Certificate of Credentials" only relies on the qualifications of the builders and accountants to affiliate with the enterprise, so as to obtain a lucrative abacus with generous remuneration or it will be overturned. In contrast, for construction enterprises, this will be another reform bonus, eliminating the cost of qualified personnel and reducing the burden on enterprises. According to preliminary estimates, the total burden of construction enterprises in the whole year will exceed 10 billion.
The qualification management of the construction industry is one of the factors that have the greatest impact on the development of the industry. From the situation in recent years, its disadvantages have become more and more obvious. The lowering of the qualification threshold also means that the market vitality will be further activated. The construction industry is gradually moving from the era of relationship competition to the era of competence competition. Improving the core competitiveness of enterprises will become the most critical task.
Cancel the requirements of the “Special Qualification Standards for Construction General Contracting Enterprises” (Jianshi [2007] No. 72) regarding the enterprise managers, financial managers and first-level construction engineers.
The requirements of the "Quality Standards for Construction Enterprises" (Jianshi [2014] No. 159) regarding the registered builders, professional title personnel, on-site management personnel holding position certificates, and skilled workers are abolished.
Starting from January 1, 2017, for enterprises applying for general contracting and first-class qualifications in construction engineering and municipal public works construction, the project performance is subject to the national construction market supervision and integrity information release platform. The results that do not enter the release platform are not valid. Performance recognition.
The era of certificate anchoring ends here
The "Letter for Opinions on Adjusting Some Indicators of the Qualification Standards of Construction Enterprises" (Jianshi Shihan [2016] No. 86) states that: the first-level builders, registered builders, enterprise managers, and financial officers in the qualification standards for construction enterprises , Professional title personnel, on-site management personnel holding a job certificate, technical workers and other indicators; starting from January 1, 2017, companies applying for construction engineering, municipal public works construction general contracting special qualifications and first-level qualifications, the project performance is national construction The market supervision and integrity information release platform shall prevail, and the performance that has not entered the release platform shall not be regarded as a valid performance determination.
The reporter learned that the current cost of the qualification of the first-level construction division and the person in charge of finance is 20,000-30,000 yuan / year / person. The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has been committed to solving the problem of the stigmatizing certificate attachment. Previously, the phenomenon of one-person dual-post, one-certification dual-use, etc. has been exposed for this purpose. After the promulgation of this policy, the "Assessment Team" may get a wishful abacus with a generous remuneration or it will be overturned.
Regarding whether the cancellation of personnel assessment indicators will weaken the supervision of enterprises, this adjustment specifically emphasizes the role of the “National Construction Market Supervision and Integrity Information Publishing Platform”, and any performance not entered in the platform will not be considered as effective performance. This move will undoubtedly further promote the company's integrity management and industry self-discipline. The state's reform spirit of simplifying administration and decentralization in the construction market is undoubtedly demonstrated.
At the same time, the solicitation of opinions followed the programmatic requirements of the State Council's emphasis on the "market plays a decisive role in the allocation of resources", reflecting the "diluted corporate qualifications" in the "Several Opinions on Promoting the Development and Reform of the Construction Industry" issued by the Ministry of Housing and Construction in 2014 Management "and other requirements. In addition to the previous adjustments to corporate assets and the amount of single contracts that can be undertaken, the qualification threshold for construction enterprises has been further reduced, and market vitality will be greatly stimulated. This is also the main intention of this adjustment.
Construction qualification related policies have been introduced.
The Third Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee opened the door to the reform of the construction industry. As a typical traditional industry, the construction industry is the driving force behind social and economic development. The most intuitive manifestation of the government's increasing reform efforts is the adjustment of the construction qualification policy, because qualification is the guarantee of construction for construction enterprises, and qualification is the sword of life and death hanging on the company's head. Transformation and upgrading are critical.
Prior to this, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development has carried out several major reforms on qualifications. In 2014, the Ministry of Housing and Construction issued “Several Opinions on Promoting the Development and Reform of the Construction Industry”. This document, known as a programmatic document for deepening the reform of the construction industry, opened the curtain on the reform of the construction industry. Subsequently, a series of heavyweight reform policies were introduced intensively.
In November of the same year, the Ministry of Housing and Construction issued the "Quality Standards for Construction Enterprises" and stipulated that they will be implemented from January 1, 2015. The "Quality Standards for Construction Enterprises" issued by the original Ministry of Construction (Jianjian [2001] 82) (No.) is repealed at the same time.
In 2015, in order to strengthen the supervision and management of construction activities, maintain public interest and regulate the order of the construction market, ensure the quality and safety of construction projects, and promote the healthy development of the construction industry, a series of documents on enterprise qualification management, "Regulations on Construction Enterprise Qualification Management," "Construction Industry The Enterprise Qualification Management Provisions and Implementation Opinions on Qualification Standards were issued one after another.
Last year, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development cancelled administrative examination and approval of four engineering design and construction qualifications for building intelligence, fire protection facilities, building decoration and decoration, and building curtain walls. In June this year, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development approved Zhejiang, Anhui, and Shaanxi to launch pilot reforms of the construction labor system , Cancel construction labor qualification, speed up the transformation and upgrading of enterprises ...
In addition, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China has promulgated "Several Provisions on Promoting the Unified Opening of the Construction Market", which aims to establish a sound, unified, open and competitive construction market system and promote fair competition among construction enterprises.
Construction qualification transformation and upgrading is imminent
It will be implemented according to the contents of the "Letter for Soliciting Opinions", which will have different impacts on enterprises and individuals.
According to survey data provided by relevant companies, according to preliminary estimates of current market prices, the annual cost of maintaining a company's and personal qualifications for construction enterprises is between 1 million yuan and 2 million yuan. It can be said to be a "burden reduction", which will also be the opportunity for construction companies to receive reform dividends. According to estimates, the total burden reduction of construction enterprises throughout the year will exceed 10 billion.
Insiders pointed out that the adjustment policy has a clear orientation, and the focus on qualifications has changed to the supervision of the engineering project itself. Qualifications have a smaller role in the market. The policy dilutes corporate qualification management, strengthens individual qualification management, and promotes full employee certification. In the short term, the need for certification for purely anchoring purposes may decrease, but for the survival and operation of enterprises to receive projects, registered construction teacher certificates must be used. As the pressure on enterprises to train skilled engineering technology and manage certificate holders increases, Persecution of real unlicensed project managers, professional title personnel, on-site management personnel holding position certificates, and technical workers is verified. The rigid demand is released again, and the construction engineer certificate will have a higher gold content.
In this regard, Shanghai Luban Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd. stated that the construction industry qualification management is one of the factors that have the greatest impact on the development of the industry. Construction enterprises have concentrated their corporate development pursuits and resource allocation on qualification upgrades. However, in recent years, the disadvantages have become increasingly serious. The more obvious. The current construction enterprises must realize that in the new competition stage, they must re-examine the enterprise strategy and competition strategy. If they are still led by the upgrading of qualifications, they will likely lose more than they pay.
